ESSEC Working Papers,
ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School

Abstract: If there is a concept that has gained awareness during the financial crisis of 2008/2009, it is certainly the concept of risk and its consequence in risk management. The failure of many financial institutions to grasp the risks they were taking appeared so clearly and was so costly that the subject became central both with the regulators and more generally within society. Even though risk is an old concept, its perception has changed over the ages. In this century, the increase of wealth and the advances of scientific techniques may give the illusion to mankind that it has full power over Nature. People are either risk adverse or risk prone, without accepting its possible negative consequences, reactions that could be qualified as extreme and silly. Looking at it in a binary way does not help us cope with it. There is indeed little rational behavior when risk is concerned. Instead we should consider its right definition to be able to manage it. Already in the XVIII th century, philosophers came to realize that risk could contain two aspects as summarized by the French thinker Etienne Bonnot de Condillac (1714-1780) who qualified risk as " The chance of incurring a bad outcome, coupled, with the hope, if we escape it, to achieve a good one. " We see here the birth of a notion that will become prevalent in finance and economics during the XX th century.

Keywords: extreme risk; risk management

JEL-codes: C51; C53; C73; D81; G17; G22

13 pages, October 2015

Full text files

document  

Download statistics

• ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Sophie Magnanou ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2024-02-05 15:47:17.