European Business Schools Librarian's Group

ESSEC Working Papers,
ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School

No WP1610: Nominal income versus Taylor-type rules in practice

Jonathan Benchimol () and André Fourçans ()
Additional contact information
Jonathan Benchimol: Bank of Israel
André Fourçans: Essec Business School

Abstract: Since the beginning of the financial crisis, a lively debate has emerged regarding which monetary policy rule the Fed (and other central banks) should follow, if any. To clarify this debate, several questions must be answered. Which monetary policy rule best the historical data? Which monetary policy rule best minimizes economic uncertainty and the Fed’s loss function? Which rule is best in terms of household welfare? Among the different rules, are NGDP growth or level targeting rules a good option, and when? Do they perform better than Taylor-type rules? To answer these questions, we use Bayesian estimations to test the Smets and Wouters (2007) model under nine different monetary policy rules with US data from 1955 to 2015 and over three different sub-periods. We find that when considering only the central bank’s loss function, the estimates generally indicate the superiority of NGDP level targeting rules, whatever the period. However, if other criteria are considered, the central bank’s objectives are not consistently met by a single rule for all periods.

Keywords: Monetary policy; NGDP targeting; Taylor rule; DSGE model

JEL-codes: E32; E52; E58

37 pages, July 4, 2016

Full text files

document PDF-file 

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Sophie Magnanou ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2024-02-05 15:47:17.