European Business Schools Librarian's Group
IESE Research Papers,
IESE Business School
No D/672: Are external technology sourcing strategies substitutes or complements? The case of embodied versus disembodied technology acquisition
Bruno Cassiman () and Reinhilde Veugelers
Additional contact information
Bruno Cassiman: IESE Business School, Postal: Research Division, Av Pearson 21, 08034 Barcelona, SPAIN
Reinhilde Veugelers: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Abstract: This paper analyzes the choice between different external technology sourcing activities of a firm. On the one hand, the firm can acquire new technology which is embodied in personnel. On the other hand, the firm can obtain new technology disembodied through a licensing agreement or by outsourcing the technology development from an R&D contractor. Building on Cassiman and Veugelers (2006), we test whether embodied and disembodied technology acquisitions are complementary activities or rather behave as substitute technology acquisition alternatives. We find that while internal and external technology acquisition are complementary innovation activities, the actual choice of external technology sourcing between embodied or disembodied modes is substitutive for smaller firms. The evidence for larger firms suggests that different external technology sourcing activities are complementary, but in this case the results are suggestive although not strongly significant.
Keywords: Embodied & disembodied technology acquisition; complementarity; substitutability
22 pages, January 23, 2007
Full text files
DI-0672-E.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Noelia Romero ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2024-02-05 15:47:29.