Massimo Motta and Thomas Rønde
Additional contact information
Massimo Motta: European University Institute, Florence, Postal: European University Institute, , Department of Economics, , via dei Roccettini9, , I-50016 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy
Thomas Rønde: University of Mannheim, Postal: University of Mannheim, Copenhagen Business School, and C.E.P.R., London
Abstract: We show that when the researcher’s (observable but not contractible) contribution
to innovation is crucial, a covenant not to compete (CNC) reduces e.ort and profits
under both spot and relational contracts. Having no CNC allows the researcher to
leave for a rival. This alleviates a commitment problem by forcing the firm to reward
a successful researcher. However, if the firm’s R&D investment mainly matters,
including a CNC in the contract is optimal, as it ensures the firm’s incentives to
invest.
Keywords: Innovation; intellectual property rights; labor contracts; poaching; relational contracts; start-ups
JEL-codes: J30; K20; L14; O31; O34
34 pages, September 1, 2002
Full text files
6800![]()
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Lars Nondal ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:cbsnow:2002_008This page generated on 2025-02-11 04:36:04.