Massimo Motta and Thomas Rønde
Additional contact information
Massimo Motta: European University Institute, Florence, Postal: European University Institute, , Department of Economics, , via dei Roccettini9, , I-50016 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy
Thomas Rønde: University of Mannheim, Postal: University of Mannheim, Copenhagen Business School, and C.E.P.R., London
Abstract: We show that when the researcher’s (observable but not contractible) contribution
to innovation is crucial, a covenant not to compete (CNC) reduces e.ort and profits
under both spot and relational contracts. Having no CNC allows the researcher to
leave for a rival. This alleviates a commitment problem by forcing the firm to reward
a successful researcher. However, if the firm’s R&D investment mainly matters,
including a CNC in the contract is optimal, as it ensures the firm’s incentives to
invest.
Keywords: Innovation; intellectual property rights; labor contracts; poaching; relational contracts; start-ups
JEL-codes: J30; K20; L14; O31; O34
34 pages, September 1, 2002
Full text files
6800
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Lars Nondal ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:hhs:cbsnow:2002_008This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:19:22.