IESE Research Papers,
IESE Business School

Abstract: We argue that the equity premium puzzle may be explained by the fact that most market participants (equity investors, investment banks, analysts, companies¿) do not use standard theory (such as a standard representative consumer asset pricing model) for determining their Required Equity Premium, but rather, they use historical data and advices from textbooks and finance professors. Consequently, ex-ante equity premia have been high, market prices have been consistently undervalued, and the ex-post risk premia has been also high. Professors use in class and in their textbooks high equity premia (average around 6%, range from 3 to 10%), and investors use higher equity premia for valuing companies (average around 6%). The overall result is that equity prices have been, on average, undervalued in the last decades and, consequently, the measured ex-post equity premium is also high. As most investors use historical data and textbook prescriptions to estimate the required and the expected equity premium, the undervaluation and the high ex-post risk premium are self fulfilling prophecies.

Keywords: equity premium puzzle; required equity premium; historical equity premium

JEL-codes: G12; G31; M21

35 pages, September 7, 2009

Full text files

DI-0821-E.pdf  

Download statistics

• IESE Business School
• Ordering Working Papers
• Home page for this series

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Noelia Romero ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0821This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:20:02.