European Business Schools Librarian's Group

Department of Economics Working Papers,
Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics

Theoretical vs. Empirical Power Indices: Do Preferences Matter?

Harald Badinger (), Monika Mühlböck (), Elisabeth Nindl () and Wolf Heinrich Reuter ()
Additional contact information
Harald Badinger: Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business
Monika Mühlböck: Department of Political Science, University of Salzburg
Elisabeth Nindl: Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business
Wolf Heinrich Reuter: Department of Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business

Abstract: This paper considers empirically whether preference-based (empirical) power indices differ significantly from their preference-free (theoretical) counterparts. Drawing on the to date most comprehensive sample of EU Council votes (1993-2011), we use item-response models to estimate the EU27 member states’ preferences (ideal points) in a one-dimensional policy space. Their posterior distributions are then used for the calculation of empirical versions of the Banzhaf, the Shapley-Shubik, and other power indices, invoking the concepts of connected coalitions and bloc voting. Our ideal point estimates point to significant differences in member states’ preferences, which often translate into significant differences of empirical (versus theoretical) power under individual voting. However, the formation of voting blocs appears to offset differences in countries’ ideal points as the bloc size grows. Interestingly, this result does not hold up for the Shapley-Shubik index, whose empirical variant differs from the theoretical one both under individual and bloc voting.

Keywords: EU Council, Spatial Voting, Power Index

JEL-codes: D72; C71; C72 June 2013

Note: PDF Document

Full text files

wp153.pdf PDF-file 

Download statistics

Report problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2018-02-15 23:08:26.