Department of Economics Working Papers,
Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics

Abstract: Interpersonal trust is a one-sided social dilemma.Building on the binary trust game, we ask how trust and trustworthiness can evolve in a population where partners are matched randomly and agents sometimes act as trustors and sometimes as trustees. Trustors have the option to costly check a trustee's last action and to condition their behavior on the signal they receive. We show that the resulting population game admits two components of Nash equilibria. Nevertheless, the long-run outcome of an evolutionary social learning process modeled by the best response dynamics is unique. Even if unconditional distrust initially abounds, the trustors' checking option leads trustees to build a reputation for trustworthiness by honoring trust. This invites free-riders among the trustors who save the costs of checking and trust blindly, until it does no longer pay for trustees to behave in a trustworthy manner. This results in cyclical convergence to a mixed equilibrium with behavioral heterogeneity where suspicious checking and blind trusting coexist while unconditional distrust vanishes.

Keywords: trust game, evolutionary game theory, reputation, best response dynamics

JEL-codes: C72; C90 January 2016

Note: PDF Document

Full text files

wp212.pdf  

Download statistics

• Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics
• Home page for this series

Report problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

This page generated on 2024-04-23 04:35:59.