European Business Schools Librarian's Group
Finance Working Papers,
University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies
No 02-2: Misspecification versus bubbles in hyperinflation data: Comment.
Tom Engsted ()
Additional contact information
Tom Engsted: Department of Finance, Aarhus School of Business, Postal: Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
Abstract: In this comment I critically review some of the claims and analyses made by Hooker (2000) in his study of the Cagan hyperinflation model. I argue that: i) contrary to what Hooker claims, cointegration tests can be used to discriminate between bubbles and no bubbles; ii) contrary to Hooker's claim, his empirical results for the interwar European hyperinflations do not general imply that the Cagan model is misspecified; iii) although Hooker's analyses build directly on the Durlauf and Hall (1989) methodology, he neglects an important part of that methodology, namely the measurement of the magnitude of noise. I present such measures, and together with reported cointegration tests the noise measure help reinterpreting Hooker's empirical results.
Keywords: Cagan model; Cointegration; Measurement of noise
14 pages, February 21, 2002
Full text files
D02_2.PDF
- University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies
- Home page for this series
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Helle Vinbaek Stenholt ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2024-02-12 04:36:22.