Veronique MALLERET, Annick BOURGUIGNON and Hanne NORREKLIT
Additional contact information
Annick BOURGUIGNON: ESSEC Business School
Hanne NORREKLIT: Aarhus School of Business
Abstract: Currently much attention is given to strategic measurement systems with the balanced scorecard as the far most high profiled. This US-born approach has not been very warmly welcome in France where tableau de bord, a French strategic measurement system, has been used for at least 50 years. The differences between both approaches have been variously discussed. This paper investigates the cultural and ideological hypotheses founding both methods, which may explain their differences as well as the climate surrounding the debate. This broadens up the usual perspective regarding performance measurement systems, which are usually implemented with respect to their strategic and organizational relevance - their cultural and ideological backgrounds being generally disregarded. In addition, this analysis provides some insight into the more general question of the transferability of management methods.
Keywords: balanced score card; tableau de bord; cultural perspective
JEL-codes: M41
43 pages, March 1, 2001
Full text files
b238ea034d08e3b258e080d334376553.pdf
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Antoine Haldemann ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:ebg:heccah:0724This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:19:52.