Clemens A. Otto () and Paolo F. Volpin ()
Abstract: We examine how mark-to-market accounting affects investment decisions in an agency model with reputation concerns. Reporting the current market value of a firm's assets in the financial statements can serve as a disciplining device because the information contained in the market price provides a benchmark against which the agent's actions can be evaluated. However, the fact that market prices are informative can have a perverse effect on the investment decisions: The agent may prefer to ignore relevant but contradictory private information whose revelation would damage his reputation. Surprisingly, this effect makes mark-to-market accounting less desirable as market prices become more informative.
Keywords: Accounting rules; marking to market; historical cost accounting; investment decisions; reputation; agency problem
49 pages, June 29, 2013
Full text files
papers.cfm?abstract_id=2218349
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Antoine Haldemann ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:ebg:heccah:0986This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:19:53.