Clemens A. Otto () and Paolo F. Volpin ()
Abstract: We examine how mark-to-market accounting affects investment decisions in an agency model with reputation concerns. Reporting the current market value of a firm's assets in the financial statements can serve as a disciplining device because the information contained in the market price provides a benchmark against which the agent's actions can be evaluated. However, the fact that market prices are informative can have a perverse effect on the investment decisions: The agent may prefer to ignore relevant but contradictory private information whose revelation would damage his reputation. Surprisingly, this effect makes mark-to-market accounting less desirable as market prices become more informative.
Keywords: Accounting rules; marking to market; historical cost accounting; investment decisions; reputation; agency problem
49 pages, June 29, 2013
Full text files
papers.cfm?abstract_id=2218349
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Antoine Haldemann ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
This page generated on 2024-02-05 15:47:25.