Andrew Sarta, Rodolphe Durand and Jean-Philippe Vergne
Additional contact information
Andrew Sarta: York University; Western University, Ivey Business School
Rodolphe Durand: HEC Paris
Jean-Philippe Vergne: University College London - School of Management
Abstract: Organizational adaptation is equivocal. On the one hand, the concept is ubiquitous in management research and acts as the glue binding together the central issues of organizational change, performance, and survival. On the other hand, it lurks around in various guises (e.g., “fit,” “alignment,” “congruence,” and “strategic change”) studied from multiple theoretical streams (e.g., behavioral, resource-based, and institutional), and at different levels of analysis (e.g., organization- and industry-level). In a novel approach to reviewing 443 adaptation articles that leverages both computational and hand-coded analysis, we produce an interactive visual of the themes most studied by adaptation scholars. We inductively draw out a definition of adaptation as intentional decision-making undertaken by organizational members, leading to observable actions that aim to reduce the distance between an organization and its economic and institutional environments. We then review the literature across three main areas of inquiry and six theoretical perspectives that surfaced from our analysis and identify eleven difficulties that have hampered adaptation research in the past 50 years. Our review suggests ways to address these difficulties to enable future research to develop and cumulate.
Keywords: adaptation; fit; congruence; topic modeling; evolution; strategic change; performance
JEL-codes: L20
33 pages, May 28, 2020
Full text files
papers.cfm?abstract_id=3589257 HTML file Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Antoine Haldemann ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:ebg:heccah:1375This page generated on 2024-09-13 22:19:53.