Mohammed Abdellaoui (), Brian Hill () and Sarat Chandra Akella ()
Additional contact information
Mohammed Abdellaoui: HEC Paris
Brian Hill: HEC Paris
Sarat Chandra Akella: HEC Paris
Abstract: A popular framework for ambiguity represents alternatives of choice as twostage gambles reflecting the uncertainty about the true probability on the state space. In this framework, ambiguity-averse behaviour could be driven by differences in utilities between stages-as in the smooth ambiguity model (Klibanoff et al., 2005)-or by non-linear probability weighting-as in a line of research initiated by Segal (1987). The present paper investigates the relevance of these distinct drivers of ambiguity attitudes in a two-stage setup by estimating a generalization of the smooth ambiguity model incorporating probability weighting. Our experiment reveals the relevance of both factors to describing ambiguity attitudes. We also report evidence of stakes-dependence of ambiguity attitudes, as implied by utility-driven approaches.
Keywords: Ambiguity; ambiguity aversion; probability weighting; rank-dependent utility; recursive expected utility; smooth ambiguity model
65 pages, August 26, 2024
Full text files
papers.cfm?abstract_id=4916177 HTML file Full text
Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Antoine Haldemann ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().
RePEc:ebg:heccah:1530This page generated on 2024-12-04 11:43:07.